Connect your ecosystem

Coming soon

Assess your SME's readiness to join a Data-Driven Platform of Platforms (DPoP) in a decentralized supply chain. Map your position in the chain, score your ESG baseline, weigh material issues, validate LGPD/GDPR/CLOUD compliance, place yourself on the four-quadrant platform model (Monopoly / Fragmented / GSM / Internet), activate the network effects that fit your business, and generate a transparency report aligned with the institutional ESG-mandate capital pool.

Go to home
  1. 01Identity
  2. 02Current chain
  3. 03Data assets
  4. 04ESG baseline
  5. 05Materiality
  6. 06Compliance
  7. 07Platform model
  8. 08Network effects
  9. 09DPoP report
Inputs persist across steps in this session. Saving as a named scenario will be enabled in a future release.

Step 9 · DPoP report

A one-page snapshot you can share with ESG investors, ecosystem partners, and internal stakeholders. Numbers are recalculated live from the previous steps.

PDF export and scenario save are temporarily disabled. Until the back-end vault is wired, please use your browser's Print dialog to save this report as a PDF.
Identity
— · Last-mile delivery · App-based carrier
Size
— employees · — fleet
Chain
— upstream · — downstream · —% top dep.
ESG baseline
E 35 · S 48 · G 30 · agg. 38
Compliance
0/7 items ready (LGPD, GDPR, CLOUD, EU Data Act, EU AI Act, homomorphic encryption, federated ML)
Platform model
not set

Network value (live)

With N = 12 stakeholders, Reed's Law dominates Metcalfe's by orders of magnitude — the multiplier is what makes a DPoP integration financially attractive.

N
12
Metcalfe (N²) (N²)
144
Reed (2ᴺ) (2ᴺ)
4,083
N
12
Metcalfe (N²) (N²)
144
Reed (2ᴺ) (2ᴺ)
4,083

Logarithmic Y-axis. Reed's Law captures the value of subgroup formation inside the network — a far better fit for a DPoP than Metcalfe's pairwise count.

Figure 1 — Network value under Metcalfe's Law (N²) versus Reed's Law (2ᴺ), logarithmic Y-axis. Live values shown above the figure.

1 network-effect categories activated.

Top material issues

IssueImportance to stakeholdersImpact on the business
Carbon emissions — Scope 1 & 2 (own operations)7085
Carbon emissions — Scope 3 (outsourced fleet, last-mile)9294
Fuel and energy efficiency7580
Driver and courier safety7085
Data privacy & cybersecurity8075
Labour conditions6570
Supplier diversity4550
Corporate ethics & anti-corruption8085
Community impact5060
Figure 2 — Materiality matrix (IFRS S1 single-materiality and CSRD/ESRS double-materiality reads). The colour intensity follows importance × impact.
  1. 1. Carbon emissions — Scope 3 (outsourced fleet, last-mile) (92 × 94)
  2. 2. Corporate ethics & anti-corruption (80 × 85)
  3. 3. Fuel and energy efficiency (75 × 80)
This snapshot is illustrative and based on self-assessed inputs. It does not replace a formal ESG audit or a regulatory filing. Methodology: de Miranda Neto (2024), SSRN 6735341 · MBA in Digital Business, USP/ESALQ (2024).
Back: Network effects